South Dakota Custody and Co-Parenting Laws
This page provides an educational overview of South Dakota child custody and co-parenting laws.
It explains common legal terms, court expectations, and how custody decisions are generally made.
​
This information is not legal advice. Every family’s situation is unique, and outcomes depend on individual facts. For guidance specific to your circumstances, consult a licensed South Dakota family law
attorney.
Table of Contents
Paternity & Legal Parentage in South Dakota
Legal paternity establishes who is recognized as a child’s legal father. When parents are married at the time of a child’s birth, paternity is generally presumed. When parents are not married, paternity must be legally established before the court can issue orders related to custody, parenting time, or child support.
Paternity may be established voluntarily when both parents sign an Acknowledgment of Paternity (AOP), which is commonly completed at the hospital at the time of birth or through the state’s vital records process. Once properly executed and filed, the acknowledgment has the same legal effect as a court order establishing paternity unless it is rescinded or challenged within the time allowed by law. If paternity is disputed, either parent or the state may ask the court to make a determination, which can include genetic testing.
Establishing paternity provides the legal foundation the court relies on when addressing custody and parental responsibilities. In many cases, this step is procedural rather than adversarial and is intended to give the court authority to evaluate parenting arrangements under South Dakota law.
Once legal parentage is established, both parents have standing before the court. Establishing paternity does not determine custody or parenting time outcomes on its own; instead, it allows the court to evaluate custody, parenting time, and decision-making authority based on the child’s best interests.
Best Interest of the Child Standard
Decisions about custody and parenting time are guided by the best interest of the child standard. Courts focus on the child’s overall well-being rather than the preferences or disputes of either parent. No single factor controls the outcome; courts consider multiple factors based on the circumstances of each family. South Dakota law does not set out a detailed statutory list of best-interest factors, and courts are given broad discretion to evaluate each case based on its facts.
Factors courts may consider when evaluating a child’s best interests:
​
-
The child’s relationship with each parent
-
Each parent’s ability to meet the child’s needs and provide stability
-
The child’s adjustment to home, school, and community
-
Each parent’s willingness and ability to support the child’s relationship with the other parent
-
The mental and physical health of all individuals involved
-
Any history of domestic violence or abuse
-
The child’s wishes, when the court determines the child is of sufficient age and maturity
Courts place significant weight on demonstrated patterns of caregiving, involvement, and cooperation. How parenting responsibilities have been handled in practice often matters more than stated intentions. The court’s role is not to reward or punish either parent, but to establish arrangements that support the child’s safety, stability, and long-term interests.
Because best-interest determinations are fact-specific, outcomes can vary even in cases that appear similar. Courts retain broad discretion to weigh the evidence presented and balance competing considerations when issuing custody and parenting-time orders consistent with South Dakota law.
Physical Custody
Physical custody addresses where a child resides and how time is shared between parents. The court’s focus is on creating arrangements that support the child’s stability, safety, and ongoing relationships, rather than on labels or parental preference.
Parenting time is determined based on the child’s best interests and the family’s circumstances. Courts evaluate whether proposed arrangements are workable in practice and whether they support the child’s routines and continuity over time.
South Dakota recognizes both sole and joint custody arrangements and places emphasis on how parenting time functions day to day. Joint custody does not require equal time, and courts do not apply a default schedule. Instead, arrangements are shaped by the evidence presented and each parent’s demonstrated involvement in the child’s care.
Once established, parenting-time orders are intended to provide predictability and reduce conflict. Parents are expected to follow the schedule as ordered and manage reasonable flexibility cooperatively. When disputes arise, courts assess whether changes are needed based on the child’s needs rather than parental convenience.
Legal Custody
Legal custody addresses who has the authority to make major decisions affecting a child’s upbringing, including matters related to education, health care, and religious training. This authority is distinct from physical custody and may be allocated separately based on how decision-making has functioned within the family.
Courts may award sole legal custody or joint legal custody. In evaluating how decision-making authority should be allocated, South Dakota courts look closely at each parent’s ability to communicate, cooperate, and make decisions in a way that serves the child’s needs. Demonstrated patterns of decision-making and cooperation tend to carry more weight than stated intentions.
Joint legal custody does not require parents to agree on every issue, but it does require a workable level of communication and good-faith participation in important decisions. When cooperation has been limited or conflict is ongoing, courts may allocate decision-making authority in a way that reduces the likelihood of future disputes.
The allocation of legal custody is not intended to establish a hierarchy between parents. Instead, it provides clarity around how major decisions are made and whether the arrangement supports stability, timely decision-making, and the child’s best interests under South Dakota law.
Court Expectations & Co-Parenting Responsibilities
Courts expect parents to approach custody and parenting arrangements with a focus on the child’s needs rather than ongoing conflict between adults. Court orders are intended to provide structure, stability, and predictability, and judges generally look for conduct that supports the child’s relationship with both parents.
Parents are expected to follow court-ordered custody arrangements and decision-making allocations as written. This includes communicating in a timely and appropriate manner, complying with schedules consistently, and making reasonable efforts to resolve routine issues without court involvement. Courts tend to evaluate compliance based on overall patterns of conduct rather than isolated incidents.
South Dakota courts also consider a parent’s willingness and ability to support the child’s relationship with the other parent. Conduct that interferes with custody arrangements, undermines cooperation, or escalates conflict may raise concerns about a parent’s ability to prioritize the child’s best interests. Consistent cooperation and reliable follow-through generally reflect favorably when arrangements are reviewed.
Because communication issues are a common source of conflict, some parents find it helpful to use structured tools designed to keep exchanges clear, documented, and focused on the child. Practical resources for improving co-parent communication are available in the Parenting Toolkit’s Communication Tools section, which is designed to support court-compliant interactions rather than emotional disputes.
Parenting Plan Overview
A parenting plan is the framework courts use to organize custody, parenting time, and decision-making responsibilities. It allows the court to see how parenting arrangements are intended to function in practice and provides structure for evaluating those arrangements under the child’s specific circumstances.
Parenting plans are commonly used in South Dakota custody matters and are often part of how courts organize parenting arrangements. Whether a parenting plan is required depends on the nature of the case and the court’s direction, rather than a universal statutory mandate. Courts may approve a plan submitted by the parents, require one during the proceedings, or issue custody orders that function as a parenting plan without a separately labeled document.
South Dakota courts review parenting plans in practical terms. The focus is on whether the plan promotes stability for the child, can be followed consistently over time, and reduces the likelihood of ongoing conflict. The plan itself does not determine custody outcomes; it provides a structured way for the court to evaluate how parenting responsibilities will be carried out.
Once incorporated into a court order, a parenting plan governs the parents’ responsibilities unless and until it is modified.
Creating a Parenting Plan
When developing a parenting plan, the focus is on creating a structure that can be followed consistently and that serves the child’s best interests. Parenting plans should be clear, specific, and practical enough to guide day-to-day parenting without requiring frequent court intervention.
A well-constructed parenting plan outlines how parenting arrangements and decision-making responsibilities will be handled in a clear and workable way. Courts look for plans that provide structure, reduce ambiguity, and can be followed consistently in practice.
South Dakota law does not require a particular format or model. Courts evaluate parenting plans based on how they function in practice, rather than whether they follow a recommended template or guideline. Plans that are realistic, detailed, and internally consistent are more likely to be approved and enforced.
Once incorporated into a custody order, the parenting plan becomes legally binding and governs the parents’ responsibilities unless and until it is modified by the court.
Modifying a Parenting Plan
Parenting plans are intended to provide stability, but they may be modified when circumstances change in a way that affects how the plan functions in practice. South Dakota courts generally expect an existing plan to remain in place unless there is a meaningful reason to revisit it.
When a modification is requested, courts evaluate whether changes have occurred that impact the child or the ability of the current plan to operate as intended. Not every disagreement or inconvenience justifies a modification. The focus is on whether the existing arrangements continue to serve the child’s needs in a practical and sustainable way.
Courts also consider how proposed changes would affect the child’s routine and sense of continuity. Modifications that introduce unnecessary disruption or increase conflict are approached cautiously. The emphasis remains on preserving stability while responding to genuine changes in circumstances.
Because modifications involve revisiting an existing court order, requests are weighed against the current plan and the principles that guided it. The question is not whether a different arrangement could work, but whether a change is needed to better support the child over time under South Dakota law.
Notes for Mothers
Mothers involved in custody and parenting matters are evaluated under the same legal standards as fathers. South Dakota courts focus on the child’s needs, the parents’ respective roles, and how parenting responsibilities have been handled in practice, rather than relying on gender-based assumptions.
Courts often look closely at patterns of caregiving, availability, and follow-through. Mothers who have served as a primary caregiver may find that the court considers how existing routines support the child’s stability, particularly for younger children. At the same time, courts also evaluate each parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
Communication and cooperation play an important role in how custody arrangements are reviewed. Courts tend to respond favorably to parents who demonstrate reliability, consistency, and a child-focused approach to decision-making. Efforts to limit conflict, comply with court orders, and encourage healthy co-parenting relationships can be influential over time.
Custody outcomes are shaped by evidence and conduct rather than expectations or labels. Mothers are best served by focusing on the child’s well-being, maintaining stable routines, and approaching parenting decisions in a way that reflects flexibility, cooperation, and long-term planning.
Notes for Fathers
Fathers involved in custody and parenting matters are evaluated under the same legal standards as mothers. South Dakota courts focus on the child’s needs and each parent’s demonstrated involvement, rather than on traditional assumptions about parental roles. Legal outcomes are driven by conduct, consistency, and the ability to meet the child’s day-to-day needs.
Courts often examine patterns of caregiving, availability, and participation in the child’s life. Fathers who have been actively involved in caregiving, school-related responsibilities, medical decisions, and daily routines may find that this involvement carries significant weight. Courts also consider a parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
Reliability and cooperation are important factors in how custody arrangements are evaluated. Courts tend to view consistent follow-through, respectful communication, and compliance with court orders favorably. Demonstrating a child-focused approach and avoiding unnecessary conflict can help support stable parenting arrangements over time.
Custody decisions are based on evidence and practical realities rather than labels or expectations. Fathers are best served by maintaining consistent involvement, supporting continuity in the child’s routine, and approaching parenting responsibilities with flexibility, cooperation, and long-term focus.
Breastfeeding Considerations
In cases involving infants or very young children, courts may consider breastfeeding as one factor when evaluating custody and parenting arrangements. The focus is not on favoring one parent, but on supporting the child’s health, development, and continuity of care during an early stage of life.
Courts generally look at how breastfeeding fits into the child’s routine and whether parenting arrangements can be structured in a way that supports the child’s needs while maintaining each parent’s involvement. Temporary adjustments or flexibility may be considered depending on the child’s age and circumstances, particularly while feeding patterns are still developing.
As children grow and feeding needs change, courts expect parenting arrangements to evolve as well. Breastfeeding considerations are typically time-limited and balanced against the importance of maintaining and strengthening the child’s relationship with both parents. The emphasis remains on adaptability and minimizing conflict during a period that can already be demanding for everyone involved.
South Dakota courts encourage parents to approach breastfeeding-related issues with cooperation and practical problem-solving. Clear communication and flexibility can help support arrangements that meet the child’s needs while allowing parenting responsibilities to adjust appropriately over time.
South Dakota Family Law & Statutes
South Dakota custody, parenting time, and parenting plan matters are governed primarily by state statutes within Title 25 of the South Dakota Codified Laws, along with applicable court rules and case law. These laws establish the framework courts use to determine legal custody, physical custody, parenting time, and parental responsibilities based on the child’s best interests.
​
Statutes commonly referenced in South Dakota custody matters include:
​
-
-
Court authority to award and modify custody and parenting arrangements
-
-
-
Parenting plan requirements and court authority to require or approve a plan
-
-
-
Temporary custody and parenting time orders
-
-
-
Joint physical custody consideration upon request; required best-interest findings
-
-
-
Best-interest factors used by the court in custody determinations
-
​
South Dakota courts apply these statutes together with case law when issuing or modifying custody orders. Because statutory guidance is limited, judicial discretion and the specific facts of each family’s situation play a significant role in custody determinations.
​
This overview is intended for educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as legal advice.
This page is for educational purposes only and is not legal advice. Always consult a licensed South Dakota family law attorney regarding your specific situation.